If implemented, I hope it will be an optional change. I like the 1-5 scale.

I also hope this will be optional as I think it’s perfect as it is. I’m honestly afraid I’ll have a hard time to rate my mood in that detail. Maybe a scale from 1-7 could be a compromise, if this is not optional.

I do prefer 1-5, just because it forces you to think simply. How will the smaller mood scale factor into this? Will currently logged scores simply be *2?

I agree that I don’t see any more granularity than 1-5 being useful, and just leads to analysis paralysis - “was today really a 7 day or just a 6?” I could potentially see more than one axis being useful as an option (eg. 5-point scales for “energy” and “confidence” or similar) but I can’t imagine more than 5 points on any sort of self-assessment being very helpful.

I agree with J W, as for me 1-5 would be enough.

Really looking forward to this change. I find 1-5 very limiting as most of my days end up being a 4 when 7-9 would be more fitting depending on the day.

I feel the same ^

One of the biggest things I was struggling with these past few days. Most of the days were either a 4 or a 5, but I felt that they definitely were not all a 9-10.

+1 for a preference of 1-5 or the option to not have to use 1-9 (or any larger scale in general). I like the current simplicity.

Yes, I think that changing it to 1-9 is fine and maybe something I could get into, but I really like the simplicity of 1-5 and also think that if the change goes ahead it should be optional.

I’m looking forward to a new scale, I also find 1-5 limiting. But what happens to already existing ratings? Will it somehow be recalculated to new numbers? My current average is 3, which means “ok”. Will it become, say, 5 or 6? Or it will stay the same and automatically becomes “bad” rather than “ok”? :)

I have an idea. What if, instead of doing a scale from 1-10, you did from 1.0-5.0? That way, you could still have the 1-5 (I feel like 1-10 is a bit too big of a range), but you could still have the variation you would have from a 1-10 rating.

I don’t think it was that clear, but make it so that you could have a decimal point, so you could do ratings like 3.7, 2.3, etc.

I’ve talked about the changes in the forum. The short answer is that old values will be migrated, so “okay” is still okay, even if the numbers now differ :) We’ll be keeping them integers, not decimals.