Suggestions

:bulb:

Correlation/Optimise date selection

When I’m trying to make changes in my life, I would like to see how well my efforts are working by only seeing data for a specific date range. I think this would be most useful on the Correlations and Optimise tabs, where the data normally goes back (up to) a year. I realize there would need to be a minimum number of days included to allow correlations and optimisations to be found.

For me, the seasons play a big part in my activities and health and it would be great to be able to compare them. Also, when trying monthly challenges, I want to see how I’m doing without including past metrics.

2 votes

Tagged as New feature

Suggested 25 November 2019 by user James Wilcox

  • Sign in to comment and vote. Sign in by email
  • 25 November 2019 James Wilcox suggested this task

  • 26 November 2019 Josh Sharp approved this task

  • avatar

    Can you elaborate a bit more on “monthly challenges” and how this relates? Are you trying to change specific behaviours and using correlations to understand whether your changes have an effect?

    26 November 2019
  • avatar

    For the monthly challenge, it could be things like changing diet, sleep habits, exercise, etc.

    I track food only a few months of the year to get an idea of what’s in the food I eat, and sporadically the rest of the time. I don’t want incomplete data to affect correlations when I’ve found motivation to start tracking everything thoroughly. I don’t want it telling me “you are more active when you consume less sugar,” only because I wasn’t tracking sugar before.

    The same goes for exercise. If I find motivation to start a challenge of exercising every day in December, I don’t like having stale data from 11 months ago affecting my correlations. If I started exercising more and my productivity increased immediately, I would want to know about that strong correlation instead of a very slight increase when averaged over the year.

    Part of the personal challenge idea is to improve yourself, but I don’t like missing data or past failures skewing correlations during a new challenge.

    Also, similar to the Eras suggestion, major life changes can make old data not relevant now.

    26 November 2019
  • avatar

    “you are more active when you consume less sugar” because I wasn’t tracking sugar before

    We ignore days with N/A data for correlations, so something like this isn’t possible. But I can still see why you might want to compare only a specific period to see if the correlation is stronger or weaker, thanks for the clarification 🙂

    27 November 2019